
Originally Posted by
Tilden
Okay, I'll give it a shot. I think it's a bit much to claim that because sex feels good that the need for it becomes a constant, insatiable craving that must be satisfied, no matter what, if one goes too long without it. If that were true, I guess it would excuse teenagers--and adults--from engaging in all kinds of stupid hook-ups that might be physically or emotionally damaging. They could just whimper, "Oh, but I just hadn't had sex in so long that I couldn't think of anything else. The urge was uncontrollable and I just had to have it, no matter the consequences."
It's not like human beings are the equivalent of animals in heat. There are plenty of people who go without sex for extended periods of time without becoming so fixated on the need for it that they can't function or lead fulfilling lives. Perhaps because I attended a Catholic college, my first thought was that I had many fine teachers who were nuns who were funny, insightful, altogether human females who seemed to function just fine--and though people don't realize it, an awful lot of contemporary nuns are joining the convent after living adult lives prior to becoming nuns, which means they're not all dewy-eyed sixteen year old virgins anymore. In fact, that's a huge exception to the rule. For that matter, I know women who have been widowed or divorced who have waited quite a while to date, much less have sex, without having some kind of major emotional meltdown that required them to have sex, no matter what. Heck, women who have just hit a run of bad luck in terms of finding a relationship don't always just throw caution to the wind and jump into bed with the first guys who'll have them, because they haven't had sex in a while.
As has been pointed out elsewhere, lots of things feel good. You can have cravings for lots of things. That doesn't mean you have to indulge those cravings or go nuts from depriving yourself. I guess you might if you were addicted, but most people aren't addicted to sex. I'd be willing to agree that young people often have less self-control than more mature adults, but once these teenagers have become parents, it's time for them to grow up. If they want to have sex, the very least they could do is practice some birth control and understand, before they choose their method, exactly how reliable it is and exactly how vigilant they have to be about following the rules for using it prior to having sex again. I noticed that at Leah's bridal shower, when she was kidded about how fast she got that condom on that banana, she laughed and said that she was going to make darn sure she didn't end up with another surprise pregnancy on her hands. Of course, no method of birth control is 100% effective, but at least she'd gotten the message, loud and clear, that you better do your best to use some method if you don't want to get pregnant again. So, yeah, I think it's hyperbole to assert that young women--or women of any age--are going to have sex because they simply haven't any other biological choice. They do. And some choose to exercise it. That doesn't make them prudes or psychologically suspect. It just means they've made a different choice than those who decide that how good having sex feels is a biological mandate that outweighs the possible consequences of having sex.