I recall something way back in the beginning seasons that the remaining jury members weren't allowed to talk about what happened once the jury began. I think it was because they didn't want to influence jury votes based on incidents that happened AFTER certain people got kicked. The only info they would get would be at TC when they observe, so if something is going to come out it would be there.
Example: Sarge will decide his vote on things that happened up to the point of his boot and only his boot. If they told him about the chicken wing thing, well heck, why stop there. Tell him about Chris double dealing and this, that and the other. They shouldn't (aren't?) allowed to decide who wins on "heresay". For that matter anyone of them in the jury could lie through their teeth to get a vote changed. No one would be the wiser except for the people that got voted out after them.Sarge could say Ami told me this in private or Chad told me that in private.
I'm not entirely sure about the jury not being able to discuss it, just something i recalled from past seasons. Anyone know for sure?