Originally Posted by TiaMaria62;4118881;
While it's still burning!
Originally Posted by TiaMaria62;4118881;
While it's still burning!
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
I remember that season, and I remember being really ticked off by the 'twist' - I agree, they have no problems changing things up from season to season. However, we're talking about NaOnka here, so maybe Probst and Mark B were just trying to keep her from flipping her lid completely - who knows what she would do!Originally Posted by KeepItReal;4118984;
Waiting patiently for Sherlock Season 3....
It's hard to believe that there could be any legal repercussions if "Survivor" had decided not to put Nayonka and Kelly on the jury. Every boxtop drawing has standard language along the lines of "Decisions of the judges are final." It has also become common to require participants in almost any ordinary transaction -- like getting a credit card or buying an appliance -- to agree to waive any right to sue in favor of binding arbitration, usually in a city and with an arbitrator selected by the lender. And these players are probably required to give up all kinds of other rights as a condition of participation, with the prospect of severe financial penalties if they don't behave. ("Survivor" is filmed months before it airs, but no player in 20+ seasons has ever given up any secrets before the broadcast. That's no accident.) The truth is that the producers probably think it will make for better TV -- more tension, more friction, more fireworks -- to have these two flunkouts on the jury. And I think they're right. What would be really interesting would be if Nayonka and Kelly refused to serve on the jury, too. I can just imagine Nayonka screaming "What part of 'I'm outta here!' don't you understand?"
Last edited by fan999; 12-02-2010 at 11:04 PM.
I mean in the real world, where everybody doesn't watch Survivor.Originally Posted by jadewarlock;4118579;
In the words of Jeff, and I quote, "Alright, so I'll snuff your torches but we're gonna keep them here at Tribal Council. They'll be a reminder to you guys when you come back in here as part of the jury as the decision you made to quit." Are they lit or not? Can't tell but it's not clear, to me it sounded like they could be.Originally Posted by jadewarlock;4118579;
Last edited by Endit; 12-02-2010 at 11:13 PM.
I was actually thinking snap them in half and don't let them on the jury. I can already see Naonka asking whoever's left "And why should I give you the million?" with her snippy attitude. I don't see a question either of them could ask that wouldn't make me laugh at them and their gall to pretend they have the right to grill the people at the final TC.Originally Posted by TiaMaria62;4118881;
I hate saying this, but Jeff is a bit wrong here - as was Burnett.Originally Posted by norm;4118752;
Janu did ask to leave the game; however, the tribe voted her out - even if vocally agreed to it, it was a vote.
That said, these two simply said "I quit," and they gave Jeff the torch. No jury vote - it was decided already at the reward challenge.
Personally, I think they had to let the duo stay there because of some tiny loophole in the contract that would've let them sue and win if Burnett et al tried to deny them the money.
Or CBS wanted the drama that would obviously ensue at the reunion - you can bet this will be the most talked about incident at the reunion, unless Burnett decides to penalize the duo for their actions and not allow this to be discussed. You remove the two from the show entirely - no PR stuff, no reunion, you won't get that drama.
Note, I said I haven't seen every episode - some seasons I've never seen, and yet can list most of them.Originally Posted by Endit;4119054;
And - if they haven't seen the show, they won't know who these people are anyway. No doubt they'd "forget in a month."
They won't be lit - all quitters have had their torches laying on the ground, unlit. In the case of Osten, I don't even think he got to do a reflection speech when they did the "fallen comrades" walk. There was no stop at his torch, no comments at all.In the words of Jeff, and I quote, "Alright, so I'll snuff your torches but we're gonna keep them here at Tribal Council. They'll be a reminder to you guys when you come back in here as part of the jury as the decision you made to quit." Are they lit or not? Can't tell but it's not clear, to me it sounded like they could be.
Jenna and Sue I think had their torches laid down, but they did at least get a comment about why they left as they were legitimate positive reasons.
I forgot about Janu's, but I'm sure the torch was laid down.
None of these torches stayed at council as far as I know - the only time I've seen them just move the torches from the side competing to a "fallen hero" side was the first season.
Frankly - I would HOPE they don't stay lit. It's disrespectful to those who are competing and have dealt with a lot of things, a couple even wanting to quit but overcame it, to let two quitters who were overall in good health and let a little bit of rain get to their heads or (in NaOnka's case) just seemed to think it was a toy that could be discarded just because she was bored.
If Nay's anemia was so bad that she had joint pain, how'd she pass the physical? It's not like you just wake up with anemia one morning...it takes time to develop. I've been borderline anemic for several years now (and when I get sick, it's full-blown to the point that I need an injection..this happened in September when I got diverticulits). Where was medical with iron supplements, Aranesp, or Epogen? (I didn't even know joint pain was a symptom of anemia before yesterday.)
Ponderosa questions: If Ponderosa only houses the jurors, what happens to the players who were voted out previously? They can't go home; everybody would know they didn't win. Do they get sent to another hotel, maybe back in the U.S., or what? Also, in Ponderosa part 2 at about 3:12, the women are shown shopping in an outdoor market and Nayonka picks up a burgundy t-shirt with a design on the front, but the design is blurred out. What could be on a t-shirt for sale in the town square that would be so offensive to an American audience that we can't see it?
They probably are in a hotel or an area of Ponderosa away from the jurors so they can't influence the game.Originally Posted by fan999;4119103;
As far as the blurring out of the shirts - they usually do this if it's a trademarked business (because to show it they'd have to pay royalties), or it's offensive.