I would say that juries have gotten more and more bitter as time went on, but Gabon was just...it almost is as bad as Marquesas. That jury was BITTER. If anything, I would switch out Sugar and put in Neleh, because she not only was loveable, but she deserved to win her season and had to instead deal with Tammy, General, and John, who were the epitome of sour grapes. I know that the Gabon folks didn't like Sugar for personal reasons, while with Neleh it was mainly hating her for playing the game, as the Rotu 4 had severe entitlement issues and thought that they were the anointed ones to the F4. I'm glad I'm not alone about Tammy and Lisi, though.Originally Posted by karalott;3613865;
When it comes to Guatemala, the cast itself was not a great cast. People like Cindy were total non-factors, and while I love Lydia, as she made it watchable for me, she was one of the weakest of all time, I would say. It was also too much about Steph. Danni deserved to win, although I would have rather had Rafe or Lydia win. It also was a bit less memorable because of the fact that sure, it was a physical season, but everything it had got outdone in the next three seasons. Marquesas, on the other hand, was where it really first started going downhill a bit when you compare it to Australia and so forth. It is sorely underrated because it was the first real case of two smaller groups of Survivors (the triad of Kathy, Paschal, Neleh and the duo of Sean/Vee) banding together to take out the Rotu 4 after the coconut chop challenge.
I didn't even think about Twila as a villain, but she would be really good. She isn't as much for the physical, although she could hold her own, but strategy-wise, she wins. I like your list of villains, although I still have to stick by having Judd on my list.