46Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Several people commented on the inconsistency in whether they do a tribal/eviction or not after someone is pulled out of the game. My bet is that the decision depends on a number of factors. Examples include:
1) Was the person pulled before or after the immunity challenge?
2) If pulled after immunity challenge was the person on the same or different team from the one going to tribal?
3) If before immunity challenge but challenge has already been constructed will that challenge work with x-2 contestants or x-1 contestants then originally planned?
4) How does getting rid of one vs. two people play into the entire scheme of things (i.e. numbers for future challenges, when merge happens, etc.)?
I bet they look at several things before deciding which scenarios to use.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Brooks 
I agree you can fill up your containers with nice clean water from sky though.
) with interview links that demonstrate the inconsistencies in Dana's story about the illness (I think the post is currently being reviewed by mods because I posted the links (not sure if I can do that)). Essentially, in 2 interviews she said the illness started before she began the game and in one interview she said it started on Day 1. This is important since it would give us info on how long it lasted, how the medical staff approached the problem (if they did) and, most importantly, perhaps shed some light on Survivor's policies when it comes to allowing contestants to participate with potential medical problems....
