Everyone, including the jury, seems to think that Natalie was young, naive, & had no game whatsoever. I saw her a little different.
Here we had a very young girl, barely out of school, playing a physically mentally & socially difficult game against people much older, wiser & more experienced in life & relationships. In many ways she was out of her league.
The ultimate goal is to win the $$$, but in order to do that you have to reach an
important secondary goal: Get to the final tribal council.
Instead of just being cannon fodder she made a day one alliance with the most experienced & competent tribemate. Rob promised to get her there if she stuck to their alliance. That was her goal - get to the end, & he offered it to her.
How many other contestants were able to do that? Certainly not the high & mighty jury members. Young & inexperienced as she was, she reached her goal & Rob got her there, just like he promised. Her strategy worked just fine, & she won an immunity or two on the way.
I wish she would have stressed this at final tribal council instead of being so passive. She used her wits, that's a plus.
Don't get the idea I would have rather seen Natalie win than Rob. No way. I just would have liked to see her get credit for some gameplay.