Nah, I got the point with Kelly B - she was trying to say she respected Naonka for treating her like an equal as you said.Originally Posted by spockwhat;4130113;
Still - shoving her like Nay did was not a smart thing, and frankly, could've put Kelly B out of the game if it did cause an injury to the rest of her leg or the prosthesis. To me, that was the worrisome part in that incident.
I do think they need to make a rule about shoving for a clue - or least enforce it - regarding fighting on the show. This wasn't a challenge, and even if it was it wasn't one where body contact was allowed, so IMHO it was fighting.
That all said, Kelly B was classy, and I respect her even more competing for taking the high road here. Nay? - still no, and again she should know that her actions would reflect on her post-game.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
I think it'll end up helping people with their social game, which seems to be very important to winning - if they have to worry about who's coming back, they will take better care when trying to blindside people. Also, I think contestants need to change up their "get rid of the strong players first" strategy. Weak players don't make enemies and end up winning.... If you're going to the end with players that don't mind getting their hands dirty, you at least stand a better chance at winning and maybe, maybe just maybe a true "player" will win some year.... floaters winning irks me to no end as does the sour grapes of jury members, as they are all liars when it comes right down to it. Yes Fabio won 3 challenges at the end, but by then all the dirty work had been done by the other players and he reaped the benefits. I wonder how long it'll take Fabio to blow his money, what a waste of cash IMO, Chase would have at least donated some to charity... oh well, another so-so season over for me.



