An Opinion - HvV - Sandra Wins!

Amanda has stated that she and Parv were not friends... they had a falling out after Micronesia and haven't really spoken since. They were not going to work together in HvV as they both had their nest eggs and they couldn't trust each other.

So Amanda may vote for Parv if she feels she had the best game play... but not out of friendship or loyalty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CuckoosNest;3902961;

The only way your theory might be wrong is if Sandra didn't end up with Russell and Parvati in the final three, but I can't see how that can happen at this point. They aren't gonna keep Colby around... even if he's been a do-nothing all game (and how disappointing that has been for me), he's still way too well-liked to risk in the F3. And Jerri has played a mostly likeable, strong-willed game... so best to not risk it where she is concerned.

I agree that Sandra has played the perfect mix of bold and subtle moves. Stoking Russell's coals was pure genius if you asked me... there is such a current campaign against him on the jury that they may credit Sandra for simply not aligning with him.

If it isn't Sandra, I'd have to go with Parvati next. She's detestable, but at least she's smart.

Russell is detestable and dumb. The dumb moves started with him being the world's worst loser at the Samoa reunion show and have continued since. If he's the best at anything on Survivor it would be the absolute best person to take with you to FTC. As Courtney said in her exit interview, a coconut husk would get more votes. Sorry, but the "with me or against me" rant and his utter temper tantrum when Jerri passed him over after the reward challenge were the marks of a player whose ego has entirely taken over, to the point where he simply isn't thinking things through.

---

Yep, Russell's brilliant play ended with the Danielle thing when he started his "let the ego and quest for revenge totally rule how you play" method, which is totally stupid. It would be the most shocking Survivor ever if Russell won with the way he's played toward the end. Started out really strong, finished really really dumb. He would rather "be in control" of everyone than win. He is the text book definition of control freak. I can not stand these types of people. Feel sorry for his family, guarantee you he's a control freak in real life too.:wow

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bonbonlover;3902976;

Amanda has stated that she and Parv were not friends... they had a falling out after Micronesia and haven't really spoken since. They were not going to work together in HvV as they both had their nest eggs and they couldn't trust each other.

So Amanda may vote for Parv if she feels she had the best game play... but not out of friendship or loyalty.

---

Did you ever get any details on their falling out? Would like to hear. Wonder if its over a dude? Maybe just Amanda's a spoiled sport, bad loser???

Anyone who makes it to F3 deserves to win it, but I think Sandra wins it hands down with this jury!

From what I have seen so far, if I were on the jury, I would vote for Sandra. I love how Sandra won't allow Russell to bully her into submission.

The only way Sandra might not win is if it somehow ended up with Jerri, Parvati and Russell as the top three. Jerri might win if the jury didn't want to give it to Parvati (a past million dollar winner).

I would be surprised if Sandra and Parvati are not BOTH in the final two. Anyone left would think that no one would vote for those who have won.

However, this season will be the first I disagree with that, save the potential of Jerri, who has become a lot more likable this season. Yet, even there, if it's Sandra/Russell/Jerri, it could lean either way.

That's the biggest irony here - this is the first time being a winner is an advantage (well mostly ;) ).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jadewarlock;3903201;

I would be surprised if Sandra and Parvati are not BOTH in the final two. Anyone left would think that no one would vote for those who have won.

However, this season will be the first I disagree with that, save the potential of Jerri, who has become a lot more likable this season.

---

Jerri 2.0 I like.

I think Parvati is a great player, combining excellence in both challenges and the social game. However, I agree Sandra should be favored, especially if she aggressively presents her case to the jury as she did in her victorious season. And I see no reason she wouldn't.

Can we add "**SPECULATION ONLY**" to the title? :)

If Sandra makes it to the F3, she's a shoe-in to win. Which makes me happy, because she has been my favorite after Rob's boot. If Parvati is in the F3 with her, she might give Sandra a run for her money. Both women have played a formidable game, so it depends on who the jurors like better. That probabaly would be Sandra.

With that, I'd say Sandra's main competition would be Jerri. People are saying that Colby could win if he made it to the end, but I don't think the Heroes would vote for Colby's lazy gameplay over Sandra. And it has already been discussed how Russell has no chance. If Jerri were to go against a combination of Sandra/Russell, Parvati/Russell, or Parvati/Sandra, she would have a good chance. Sandra and Parvati have already won this game, so Jerri can make the point that the jurors would be crowning an all-new winner. And Russell has burned way too many bridges, making Jerri look like a saint to the jurors.

I know that Parvati has been worried about the Heroes making it to the end, but she really should worry about Jerri.

Well did I call it or did I call it? Should I give a Russell esque rant about how awesome of a predictor I am????? Just kidding.