To me it seemed like as soon as Plushenko landed his quad, he assumed the gold medal was his, and the rest of his program was self-congratulatory (as if he was taking his curtain call), and as a result, he got sloppy. A few of his jumps were so crooked in the air that I couldn't believe he didn't fall on his butt! Clearly it speaks to his athleticism and ability that he was able to land them, but he didn't deserve full points for them, and his degree of execution or whatever it's called was rightly judged inferior to Evan's.Originally Posted by dagwood;3833430;
He really carried on to the media afterwards, showing what an arrogant poor sport he is. I couldn't be happier to witness his displeasure.


138Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote
In your face TYRA!
Pluschenko may be a tool but he is the best there is right now. I believe that in an athletic competition, the best athlete should be rewarded and that is Pluschenko. Stoyko, IMO, was also the best athlete in figure skating in his day. And as much as I love and support Patrick Chan, I'm also on board with Stoyko's comment that Weir deserved 5th and Chan should have been 6th. We were almost in tears here at my house when Chan fell, but at the same time I think he should have been marked accordingly. Uggghhh, I'm going to resist going into another rant about figure skating scoring so I must stop now. In Pluschenko's coach's defense, I can relate to his frustration with the judges. The Olympics is the pinnacle of their professional lives, and only in figure skating the athlete is (in part) at the mercy of a panel of judges who have considerable leeway in how they mark you. It's not like winning a race, where you either cross the finish line first or you don't. When you have the only skater who is master of the most difficult jump in skating and also turns in two virtually flawless performances and still doesn't prevail...well, the anger is understandable. I guess this was a rant after all. 


