1192LikesRuh Ro, Jill is really going to hate on Luanne now!
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Oh, well let's see LuLu hate on JillZarin. I don't much care for Lu, what with her fake pedigree and her so not earned snobbish attitude. And JillZarin, well, no need to say. Let 'em have at one another!
[QUOTE=Debb70;4209031]There are so many housewives who have posed half nude, that I can't keep up. I think Alex did and Kelly. Oh, don't forget Bethenny did that naked for PETA spread. /QUOTE]
I was just thinking that today when I read US Weekly, with Bethenny on the cover (inside they showed her PETA photo). She wore "pasties" in the Big 3 Triangle, so hey, she wasn't "naked" naked
Alex posed nude. Sonja said she keeps a nude of herself in her bedroom (don't know if it's a photo or a painting). Kelly posed for Playboy.
That does it for NY as far as I can recall.
Beverly Hills, of course, has Camille and Faye (if we found out that Taylor did, I wouldn't be surprised).
Anybody know about OC? I'd put money on Tamra and Gretchen, but don't know. Jeana did when she was younger, didn't she?
We KNOW about NJ's Danielle and her skanky tapes. I can't imagine the others doing it, but who knows?
Like I said, I enjoy her. She doesn't take herself too seriously; apart from the "Countess" comments, of course.Originally Posted by Debb70
At any rate, I wouldn't consider her naked or half naked. She showed her back in a sheet that draped like a low backed gown would, or a bikini. I saw nothing more than that.
As far as the other ladies who've shown their "assets" - Kelly has posed in Playboy; Jeana did when she was young and slim; Bethenny seems to pose nude for anything, Peta, her show, et al; Alex did, as well.
Not sure about the others.
Although, no offense to anyone living in a trailer park, but I would imagine that Tamra may have graced a few in her day.
ITA. Not really fond of The Countess but I didn't see that wicked evil side of her that Jill has. She's just funny in her high regard for her elevated position in society.....BUT...at least, she married for money and royality. Jill just married for money and I'm sure that she had no title bugged her to no end!I'm just saying.......Like I said, I enjoy her. She doesn't take herself too seriously; apart from the "Countess" comments, of course.
Jill has earned a title, but I'm not allowed to use it here.ITA. Not really fond of The Countess but I didn't see that wicked evil side of her that Jill has. She's just funny in her high regard for her elevated position in society.....BUT...at least, she married for money and royality. Jill just married for money and I'm sure that she had no title bugged her to no end!I'm just saying.......
Agreed. And although she married for money, my opinion of her really rose when she was so furious with Alex for not coming to their daughter's horse jumping show. I think she loves her children and is generally a good mother, which is more than we can say for some housewives (Tamra, I'm looking at you), and she tries to be a good person and treat people well and just generally be nice. I respect the effort, even if her manner does make me roll my eyes some times.ITA. Not really fond of The Countess but I didn't see that wicked evil side of her that Jill has. She's just funny in her high regard for her elevated position in society.....BUT...at least, she married for money and royality. Jill just married for money and I'm sure that she had no title bugged her to no end!I'm just saying.......
Won't be long now...
Tonight Bravo's replaying the last episodes of the last season. Right now I'm watching the first episode of the Yacht Trip (dum-da-da-dummmm). Bethenny just thought Kelly must've gone to Columbia the country, not the university.
I guess next hour's episode is Kookadoodle Kelly's breakdown? or is that this one? OMG, it's actually worth watching again!
Ah, the good old days.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
