First the children only get to keep 15% of their income, divided 8 ways, so less than 2%, out of which the parents take their educational, medical and other approved expenses. Will there be anything left for the children when they're grown? Who knows.Originally Posted by rebotco;3941893;
I agree that Kate is not the only parent who chooses possesions, power, fame, big homes, fancy cars etc. over spending time with their children. It is yet another way that Kate is letting her children down though and putting her needs and desires ahead of theirs, while crying all the time how she's doing all these things for her children. No she's not. They would rather have a smaller home with a less tan and botoxed mother who actually spends a lot of time with them, so stop saying it's "for the kids."
There are a lot of mothers out there who would love the opportunity to stay home and "figure out" how to support their children on the mere $21,000 a month that she gets in child support alone.