I'll second that!
I want to say that I do like how the new writers don't allow storylines to just drag on and on...viewers lose interest quickly. In the old days of Soap Operas and real housewives/moms there wasn't a lot on tv nor did the women have a lot of time to watch which makes me understand why they would drag it out so long.
So I'm very glad loose ends get tied up quickly...we live in a much faster-paced life now.
But what I haven't liked about the new writers is their want to keep so many of the old stars on screen so much. I enjoy seeing the older ones IF they are part of a storyline. Otherwise, we end up w/silliness just for the old ones.....for example, I used to love Julie and Doug but now??? They just seem to fill up space and like today at the wedding, they appeared to be bumbling fools.
I'm not sure why Billie is there, especially with Bo Brady being gone. Kate doesn't seem to have any place either....unless Stefano comes back and they start up again.
Marlena and John are fine with the good story concerning Kristen still wanting John but using Brady.
It was sad to hear Victor refer to Julie and Doug as "long lost relatives in Cruise-wear." but it was the truth. Doug says nothing and Julie, always the ham, gushes and bubbles about nonsense.
I think we saw with Alice and Tom that older stars can still have a place but done with dignity.
sorry...just spouting off. Have watched DOOL since 1966 or 67, off and on.


119Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote

