![]() |
06-12-2008, 02:14 PM
| #11 |
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 You make some good points, Kasha, especially about cozying up to Liz. It's probably too soon for any of them to be thinking that they can answer the quiz thinking "at least I know my friend ____ isn't the Mole, it has to be anyone but him." There's still too many variables. Still, what a coincidence that he was chummy with the two losers two weeks in a row. If I were the Mole I'd be more likely to be using a Paul strategy than a Bobby strategy. As far as the pig with the exemption (because we can assume the Mole would be given special knowledge to earn an exemption) that would be a tough one to pull off just because there were so many pigs spread everywhere. I'd be more inclined to think it was luck than Mole behavior. I guess I can see his actions being explained either way - like most of these guys! | |
| |
| Sponsored Links | |||
| Sponsored links | |||
06-13-2008, 05:37 PM
| #12 |
| FORT Fogey Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Dallas, TX Age: 41
Posts: 821
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 Why would the mole care about exemptions at all, other than the fact that he should APPEAR to want exemptions just like any other player. The mole getting the exemption is nothing to him/her. Leaving "more players to be eliminated" is irrelevant to the mole - one person will leave each week regardless. The only time an exemption is worth something significant to the mole is when money is taken out of the pot to accompany it (and $1000 came out last week due to the pig exemption).
__________________ ---Mike |
| |
06-13-2008, 05:41 PM
| #13 | |
| FORT Fogey Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Dallas, TX Age: 41
Posts: 821
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 Quote:
Proscribing motives for the mole that don't make any sense are not going to lead you to who the mole is.
__________________ ---Mike | |
| |
06-16-2008, 12:00 PM
| #14 |
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 I agree that the Mole doesn't really have a reason to want to win the exemption, except if it costs the pot some money (the Mole's real task). They'd want to act like they want it, because it would be suspicious if they didn't want the exemption. In week 2, both exemptions came at a price to the pot (the uphill battle challenge would have sent $35,000 to the pot if Mark and Kristen hadn't been able to win the race and their exemption), but Paul's only cost the pot $1,000, rather minor. It will be interesting to see if exemptions end up costing the pot money again this week, or if they are awarded more randomly like Nicole's was in Week 1.
__________________ Signature line? We don't need no stinkin' signature line. | |
| |
06-16-2008, 01:57 PM
| #15 |
| FORT Fogey | Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 The mole grabbing the exemption is twofold: 1) It makes him look like a player to the others vs the mole as he appears to really wants that exemption. 2) It takes the exemption out of play for the others. The other players want that exemption for themselves. Whom ever takes it away, makes it so it is out of play for them. That can be frustrating. Keeping frustration levels high is good, keeps the team off balance and less productive. |
| |
06-16-2008, 05:09 PM
| #16 | |
| FORT Fogey Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Dallas, TX Age: 41
Posts: 821
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 Quote:
As SOON as the host gave them a free pig to start the game, my wife said that that pig had something to do with the exemption. When we heard it rattle, we both knew that THAT pig had the exemption inside it, and all he had to do was break it. There was no luck to this at all. Just a smart hunch on his part.
__________________ ---Mike | |
| |
06-16-2008, 07:13 PM
| #17 |
| Helplessly Hoping Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,251
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 Who suggested and/or pushed for the two strong people to do the uphill part of the battle? That cost the pot $35,000 and would be a very moley thing to do, while looking like you were looking out for the team... I seem to remember hearing Paul's voice the most in that discussion.
__________________ www.comicfusion.com Join the Fusion Club! Avatar is Renee Montoya, the new Question, thanks Uncle David! |
| |
06-16-2008, 07:48 PM
| #18 |
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 i didn't think they knew what the battles were before the teams were chosen. i think they were just told to choose a 9 member team and a two member team. | |
| |
06-16-2008, 08:47 PM
| #19 | |
| FORT Fogey | Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 Quote:
I thought Liz initially volunteered to do "the uphill battle" and we saw some PI's saying that people knew it was going to be a physical task and she would be a poor choice. Was it Liz and Craig who initially volunteered? Anyway, I can't play it back now, but I am pretty sure there were a couple players who suggested others over Liz and the second volunteer. | |
| |
06-16-2008, 09:22 PM
| #20 |
| Helplessly Hoping Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,251
| Re: FORT Smack-A-Mole Column - Week 2 The Mole has access to information about the challenge before they happen or as they happen. I remember in Season 1, while the players were separated in a fort, Kathryn snuck out to talk to the team attacking the fort to give away positions and get information from them. So the Mole gets information the other contestants don't.
__________________ www.comicfusion.com Join the Fusion Club! Avatar is Renee Montoya, the new Question, thanks Uncle David! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |