This interview is horrible. What an idiot (pardon my French)!Originally Posted by brockdrywall
Chad V.
Eric
Greg
Vic
Wade
This interview is horrible. What an idiot (pardon my French)!Originally Posted by brockdrywall
You missed the best part of the interview, when he says that 99% of people are nice to him, and the others are all drunk guys who want to pick a fight because he's talking to their girlfriends.
Uh, molester Campos? Let me make this crystal-clear: If I ever found you approaching my girlfriend, there would be no picking of fights. You would be immediately dragged outside, beaten, and reminded to start respecting women, or keep getting beaten till the message gets through. You are famous for sexually assaulting a woman. What part of "not allowed to talk to women in public till you own up to your actions" do you not understand? And what part of "don't hit on girls when their boyfriends are there" don't you get? That's just begging for an ass-kicking, you schmuck.
Originally Posted by brockdrywall
![]()
Interesting how he claims TheSmokingGun is spreading lies about him. I believe TSG is very clear on the fact that they don't espouse opinions - they let legal documents speak for themselves.
Quote from TV Guide Interview
Campos: "Anyway, they told me they would give me a second chance with Erin, and I decided to pursue that."
WHAT IS THAT ALL ABOUT!! A second chance with Erin. Please tell me we are not going to have to watch Rob grovel, mumble with marbles in mouth, lame conversation..... etc.
Someone wake me when it's over. Brock's drinking game is definitely happening...... never mind waking me when it's over.
How to deny facts is what they teach you in law school.Originally Posted by John
Oh no, I didn't miss that part. I dismissed that part. That was his ego talking. Rob is full of ...Originally Posted by brockdrywall
himself.
I would agree that any man who sexually assaulted a woman deserves an ass kicking, and I'd love to throw the first kick. And I also realize that TSG wouldn't print anything that they couldn't back up with documentation. However, unless anyone else was in the room the night of Rob's alleged attack and saw what happened, it's all hearsay and allegations. Because the woman dropped the charges and it never went to trial, I think it's unfair to assume that the event happened the way it's being portrayed by the media.Originally Posted by brockdrywall
Correct me if I'm wrong or if I'm under the wrong impression here. I'm just going by memory of what I read on the FLOM-1 thread, but I seem to recall that's the way it happened. Allegations were made, but the charges were dropped. Rob took his lumps when they kicked him out of the JAG program, but it wasn't formally stated that it was because of this incident.
I'm remembering another incident where a contestant on this show was accused of something similar in college, but here again no formal charges were brought up and it was all dismissed as either a misunderstanding or a downright lie. But similarly, the contestant ended up being asked to leave the school due to yet another unfortunate incident that occurred within the same time period. How easy it would be to assume the worst and smash this guy's reputation to smithareens based on hearsay and allegations and a determination to believe the worst of someone.
It's hard to remember this sometimes, but there are always two sides to every story. And since I'm throwing cliches around, people who live in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.
So very true.Originally Posted by mimi
I don't want to sound too biblical here, but I must invoke the following:
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone."
Girls, he did not even try to tell his side of the story.Originally Posted by CaliGirl