It doesn't seem appealing to me. Why don't they make the show better by getting new judges, instead of trying other stuff that is not good for the viewer?
Isn't one night how they did it the first season with the person voted out told the following week? It seems vaguely familiar.
On Monday, they can make the rehearsal edits briefer, and have Brooke interview the couple quickly off to the side after the judges (more) quickly give their remarks, and then the judges can give their scores. They can get everything done in and hour and a half. The next night they can cut out the rehashing and some of the visiting acts and just get on with the results and be done in 30 minutes.
The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything they have.
~ Author unknown
"In a world of pollution, profanity, adolescence, broccoli, zits, ozone depletion, racism, sexism, stupid guys and PMS, why the hell do people still tell me to have a nice day?" - Unknown
Spring 2016 FoRT Yearbook Title: "Most Likely to Make a Short Story Long, and a Long Story LONGER!"
I agree, they love to streeeeeeetch it out for as long as they can
The average dog is a nicer person than the average person
"The way to become boring is to say everything." Voltaire
" The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated. "