As I recently posted in another thread:
"I really despise that there is no half scoring. There is a huge difference beteen 8>8.5 and 9.5>10. Without having .5's, they are dumbing down the accuracy of what they really think of the routines (IMO the majority of 10's should be 9.5 and 10s should only be for the mindblowing stuff).
The short lived Skating With The Stars had scoring right as well: one score for technique, another for character/personality. They should change their dated system already."
Also I would also like to see them ALL given the same dance style one week or two. Then you will see who really excels by comparing apples to apples (I mean come on... jives vs waltzes? that isn't right!)
Another thing I want to see is the contestants FORCED to answer the damn questions given to them. The pros usually change the subject with "I'm so proud of you" or "We try so hard". However some of the contestants give much better answer honestly and consistently, like Chelsea didn't pipe back with only "We all try so hard", she was like "I don't know who is the biggest competition and that's why everybody is... I love you all and hate you at the same time!" and Kirstie admitted she kinda forgot her routine while in it. I like honest answers that are not a throwaway.
I like Bruno, and frankly I agree with him a lot. Ok, so he prioritizes the performance more than the technical ability, but I do love listening to him and come on... he's the ONLY interesting judge where you can't predict what he's gonna say ("VAMPIRE lovers!" "Give me sex man!" etc) Len is usually restrained snoozefest, it's all about being prim, proper, taking no chances and technical ability first, CA is usually the link between Bruno and Len, harps on the technical when it's really out of order, but also has emotional gushing and sweet tooths/slight bias for male celeb dancers.