![]() |
08-23-2007, 06:30 AM
| #31 | |
| FORT Fan Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 378
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* Quote:
Melissa sold a gold record, toured with moderate success, had a Top 10 radio single and is going to be in the big musical Dirty Dancing which opens in Toronto in October. Eva is still touring and working her first cd which also went gold. She is the first Idol winner to have two singles make Top 10 and her third single got into Top 20 and has been on the charts for four or five months. She also signed an international modelling contract with a renowned modelling agency and is a face for Maybelline. So please don't say several of them haven't lived up to their potential. They're all working in the music business and doing very well which is what they hoped for by going on Idol. They've all gotten Juno nominations as well as other honours with Kalan especially raking in a lot of awards. It's not American style success but they don't have nearly the same opportunities here and their management is shamefully bad compared to the big deals the AI's can get and they've done terrifically well in spite of those handicaps. I say without reservation that our talent stacks up to that coming out of American Idol with no problem at all. That said, my hopes aren't nearly so high for this year's group of contestants. In my opinion none of them are as talented as previous years and are going to have a tough time matching the successes of previous Idols. | |
| |
| Sponsored Links | |||
| Sponsored links | |||
08-23-2007, 05:48 PM
| #32 |
| Home to loving arms Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: the province with the really long name Age: 24
Posts: 4,657
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* For me living up to the potential would be the success reached by say Chris Daughtry or Carrie Underwood. They didn't win idol and are still vastly more successful. Yes, they don't necessarily get the same exposure/experience here, but I just don't think they could reach that level given the exposure. Personally, none of them fit into my taste. Maybe that's part of the reason I don't think they've done as well. |
| |
08-23-2007, 08:59 PM
| #33 |
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* Ah, but truly "big" success is always measured by U.S. record sales. There are a few acts - The Hip come to mind - who have enjoyed north-of-the-border stardom, but none of the Canadian Idols have come close to even that. It's kind of a shame that Jake and Zack can't pick the winner, because I think that for the most part they're really attuned to what would sell here. (Incidentally, stickle - I'm positive they would have picked Kalan as a winner.) I see what canadian angel means by "not living up to potential" - Kalan is a good example, because I believe that his talent exceeds the material he is being given to record. Hopefully one day he'll take his music in a riskier direction, because he's too good to churn out standard-issue pop-rock.
__________________ All my life, I have felt destiny tugging at my sleeve. ~ Thursday Next The truth, like humor, is where you find it. - Henry Rollins | |
| |
08-24-2007, 03:39 AM
| #34 |
| Home to loving arms Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: the province with the really long name Age: 24
Posts: 4,657
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* AJane, you said it much better than I did. Thank you. I agree, what the idols are given to work with is terrible. Especially if you look at, for example, Nelly Fertado or Nickleback. None of the idol winners come close to that kind of success. I really don't know who the judges would pick this season. They rave so much over Carly Rae and I just don't get that. I wonder if they have her pegged to win it? I'd much rather hope that it's Brian they'd pick. |
| |
08-24-2007, 03:08 PM
| #35 |
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* Brian, I think, would be harder to "sell", whereas Carly Rae belongs more to a tried-and-true formulaic type, like Kelly Clarkson (with only maybe a quarter of the vocal talent, unfortunately, but maybe the talent she does have could be developed). You know, I still don't know why Nickelback is so huge. They've certainly paved the way for people like Chris Daughtry, and to a lesser extent, bands like Default and Theory of a Deadman (who are my personal guilty pleasure ), but it still amazes me that they've managed to garner such a massive following on both sides of the border.
__________________ All my life, I have felt destiny tugging at my sleeve. ~ Thursday Next The truth, like humor, is where you find it. - Henry Rollins | |
| |
08-25-2007, 06:56 PM
| #36 | |||||
| FORT Fan Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 378
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* Quote:
For the CI winners, they're not allowed to release their cd's in the States. Idol doesn't let them. Nor is CI seen in the States. They may not be to your taste but just like in the US, they were chosen by the majority of the viewers, so given the same opportunities they likely would have reached similar levels of success as the viewer chosen AI winners. For what it's worth, Simon Fuller (I believe that's his name - one of the grand poohbahs of Idol) is on record as saying that if Kalan had won AI, he'd be a huge international star. There's no reason to think that all the things that make him a relative Canadian star wouldn't have charmed American people the same way. And then in Canada, there just isn't the star making machine like there is in the US. What tv shows can they go on? eTalk? ETCanada? That's about it. There's no Leno, no Letterman, no Ellen, no Oprah, no Larry King Live, all with millions and millions of viewers. The print media mocks them in Canada rather than idolizes them. You can't possibly hold them to the same standards as the American Idols. There is absolutely no way they could begin to achieve the same levels of success but it's certainly through no fault of their own. Compare them to other Canadian artists who operate under much the same restrictions and then your comparisons have some validity. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() | |||||
| |
08-26-2007, 12:28 AM
| #37 |
| Home to loving arms Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: the province with the really long name Age: 24
Posts: 4,657
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* |
| |
08-26-2007, 02:44 AM
| #38 |
| FORT Fan Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 378
| Re: 8/21 Top 5 The REAL Results Show Discussion Thread *SPOILERS* I dunno. Protecting their own turf? Who can figure out why the Americans do a lot of the things that they do? Why were they allowed to keep the duty Canadian softwood companies paid even though numerous world courts said the tariff was wrongly imposed? But the CI's have to sign with 19E (the Idol management company) and Sony BMG Canada. You can't release a cd in the States (nobody can, not just the Idols) on a Canadian label, you have to get signed to an American label. It also works the same way in reverse here in Canada - a cd has to be released by a Canadian record company. The thing is though that virtually any American artist is almost automatically put on a Canadian record label because it's good for their business to have a popular American signed with them, it costs them very little and they stand to make money from it. But it's very hard for a Canadian to get signed by an American label (plus part of the record has to be recorded and produced in the States but that's a whole other story). And while the CI is signed to 19E, they can't sign with an American label and 19E's sister company in the States, RCA I think, won't sign them either so the CI has to get out of their 19E contract first before they can go to the States. It's a very incestuous nasty business. And very unfair to the kids that are stuck in the middle. I think that's one reason why I get so upset when they're criticized for not doing as well the AI's when they just don't have the same chances and options. And I get angry at the media people who, if they're halfway informed about the business they're writing about knows these things, and yet they still blame say, Kalan, for not being as big a star as Kelly. It's impossible and if they don't know that, they should learn so they can publish fair and balanced articles, not make nasty snide comments about them. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |