I don't give a big "yee haw" who deserves to win. We all actually tend to choose who we'd like to win. That skews our perspectives on who we think deserves it. I prefer to see someone win who has shown gameplay but hasn't been a huge annoying butt while doing it. You don't have to be petty and immature about it. Jeff had his moments when his mouth should have remained shut, however, overall he didn't play a mean spirited, hateful game. He was pretty straight-up with people, perhaps too much. However, Jeff wasn't a whiney butt. That being said, he obviously doesn't deserve to win since he will not be there at the end.
Shelly has shown a flatout hateful side. I was watching the show last night, and I get it she's with the other side now, but she just had this general attitude where I expected to see elbows thrown and chest bumping. There was just something so "all or nothing" that it almost carries it beyond the game. I would like to think you could flip without being a total and complete piece of defecation about it. People can understand it's a game. It makes it easier to remember that when someone doesn't take such a hard edge attitude into it.
I cannot believe I am going to say this but barring a miracle that enables either Jordan or Rachel to stay and win, I think I'd rather see Adam or Kalia win. That could change in two minutes, but I definitely do not want Shelly to win. I can't even believe I would have any reason to want Rachel to win. Never would have I imagined.
And regarding whether Jeff and Jordan, especially Jordan, should have come back. It's about ratings. They were asked, they accepted. Jordan's reasoning was just as valid as anyone elses.