Originally Posted by cheekychook
Hang in there and thank you again for what you have brought to this seasons' discussions.
Originally Posted by cheekychook
Hang in there and thank you again for what you have brought to this seasons' discussions.
We need not think alike to love alike![]()
Good to know people can't hide even on the internet, nice to know they can detect fraud.Originally Posted by Bet2Win;3634521;
Last edited by lavender1960; 08-03-2009 at 04:14 PM.
I have stated before that I, personally, am not willing to offer any more specifics than I already have. Perhaps someone else on the board will be more comfortable doing so.Originally Posted by bzindsc;3634550;
"Reality is merely an illusion, although a very persistent one." - Einstein
Karen Stivali - author and very cheeky chook
someone posted in a comment sections of an article on the show that they think Jake is married, she and her husband belong to the same landowners group and they have seen a picture of Jake with a woman who is identified as his wife Christina, and unless there are 2 Jake Pavelkas living in Austin Texas who look alike, could be an old photo and that could be an ex wife, could be a girlfriend, could be an ex girlfriend or could be a phoney post or a mistake of some sort, it would just be ironicOriginally Posted by boomer_lady;3634537;
and apparently Jake was also a child actor, I see the sleuthers here discovered that a while ago
Last edited by lavender1960; 08-03-2009 at 04:17 PM.
Yes, cheeky, thank you for the information you've shared.Originally Posted by cheekychook;3634545;
![]()
Ok, thanks Cheeky actually that answers my question in my mindOriginally Posted by cheekychook;3634558;
Hilarious!!Originally Posted by sushifan;3634330;
We will all have to wait and see if any of the emails or texts come to public light.
LOL!!! You are kidding me?Originally Posted by Bet2Win;3634552;
Originally Posted by cheekychook;3634558;
cheeky ... I don't doubt that you trust your sources, and I can truly appreciate that you don't feel comfortable saying more. I certainly have not read the majority of your posts, as I haven't been on the board that much this season.
With that said, I do question some of the information ... these are rhetorical questions, not looking for answers:
If Ed was sexting to a woman while other women were present, why was she concurrently showing the sexts to her friends ... kinda weird.
If Ed was talking on the phone to a woman while other women were present, how do the other women know what was being said by Ed, did she put him on the speaker phone ... and if so, kinda weird.
If the friends weren't actual witnesses to these events, but were told second hand, and the women in question now say they do not want to come forward, but it's their friends that are ... why not come forward if all they say is true?
It's the trial lawyer in me to question allegations, regardless of the source.![]()