Thread: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

  1. #3811
    FORT Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    43

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by MissThing;2408494;
    In order for the order of the roses (hrm, sounds like it should be a Royal Order) to count, the producers would have to know the ultimate outcome from the very first episode.

    I just cannot believe that's true.
    I guess my question was less about the sequence across the shows (although it was interesting but you're also right), but for each show itself - that he doesn't pick how they go out and the producers are picking the order. I've never put much stock in how they are given out, but if this is true it just shows the level of control the producers have over absolutely everything.

  2. #3812
    Shoveling the ocean MissThing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Camp Quicherbichen
    Posts
    3,947

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by happysammy;2408507;
    I guess my question was less about the sequence across the shows (although it was interesting but you're also right), but for each show itself - that he doesn't pick how they go out and the producers are picking the order. I've never put much stock in how they are given out, but if this is true it just shows the level of control the producers have over absolutely everything.
    Ah, I misunderstood - the producers do control it, probably even more tightly now since Jesse and Charlie's seasons, .

    Mainly, I think it's for any dramatic effect in leaving a particularly tense woman waiting until the end.
    Papi on being tested for steroids: "All they are going to find is a lot of rice and beans."
    I cater to the Regs!

  3. #3813
    FORT Fan
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    202

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by DrewPA;2408500;
    Forestpal - I was not aware - either you said it and I missed it, or you didn't tell us- that your friend was going to Iraq. PLEASE don't bother him there with my dumb request - while we have all been obsessed with Andy and his future fiancee, there are a LOT more important things going on in the world than this silly little show - and Iraq is Number 1 on the list of important things!

    But please keep posting - I love your perspective.

    As a lawyer, I can say that IF there is a contract with the Navy, and IF it uses the word cad, it will be the first contract I've heard about in my 27 years of lawyering that used the term "cad"
    LOL! I wish I knew anything about contract law. Wouldn't it be funny if Andy's appearance on this show set a precedent for men not to behave like cads?

    Oh. A contract would not be legal precedent, would it?

    FP

  4. #3814
    FORT Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    68

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by happysammy;2408507;
    I guess my question was less about the sequence across the shows (although it was interesting but you're also right), but for each show itself - that he doesn't pick how they go out and the producers are picking the order. I've never put much stock in how they are given out, but if this is true it just shows the level of control the producers have over absolutely everything.
    I agree with you and I noticed last week that Andy has alternated perfectly who got a rose (b or T) week to week. It seems odd that it did go B/T/B/T/B/T/B (as far as who got the rose before the other). I have to believe that the producers do have a certain amount of control over what order roses are given out... otherwise, it would become obvious fairly quickly if he keeps giving the same girls the same roses in the same order week after week. That wouldn't even take a sleuth to figure out, lol! I, personally, think the bach has to tell the producers just before hand who is going home and they tell him what order to hand out the roses AND that he has to drag it out for better drama. Lots of dramatic pauses and the such.

  5. #3815
    FORT Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    43

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by forestpal;2408512;
    LOL! I wish I knew anything about contract law. Wouldn't it be funny if Andy's appearance on this show set a precedent for men not to behave like cads?
    Sounds like an excellent pre-nup clause to me.

  6. #3816
    FORT Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    43

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by kenlorz;2408517;
    I agree with you and I noticed last week that Andy has alternated perfectly who got a rose (b or T) week to week. It seems odd that it did go B/T/B/T/B/T/B (as far as who got the rose before the other). I have to believe that the producers do have a certain amount of control over what order roses are given out... otherwise, it would become obvious fairly quickly if he keeps giving the same girls the same roses in the same order week after week. That wouldn't even take a sleuth to figure out, lol! I, personally, think the bach has to tell the producers just before hand who is going home and they tell him what order to hand out the roses AND that he has to drag it out for better drama. Lots of dramatic pauses and the such.
    Some of the worst editing this year has been showing Andy checking for his cues, especially at the RCs. You ALWAYS see him looking to the side, then calling the next name. It's quite distracting for such a "serious" part of the show. It's been obvious in other situations as well. Or maybe I'm just paying more attention this time.

  7. #3817
    FORT Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    137

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Quote Originally Posted by forestpal;2408476;
    Isn't this all peculiar? I sort of wonder how Andy had the nerve to do it in the absence of Navy sanction. I mean, he did say he's not sure if he's going to re-up at the end of his remaining year in the service, but he also said 'it's about being a United States Naval officer." So I don't know where he stands.
    Just a clarifcation. Andy only has about a year remaining of his tour of duty in Hawaii. However, since the Navy paid for Duke and UCSF, he still owes the Navy at least another 5 years of service (8 years starting from 2004, after the completion of college, med school and his year-long surgical internship).

  8. #3818
    Premium Member pajamasam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,696

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    I sort of wonder how Andy had the nerve to do it in the absence of Navy sanction. I mean, he did say he's not sure if he's going to re-up at the end of his remaining year in the service, but he also said 'it's about being a United States Naval officer." So I don't know where he stands.
    forestpal one of our military doctor's wives - maybe Beachmom? - said that he'd owe 7-8 years to the Navy after his surgical internship year because he owes for both Duke and Med School. Sounds logical. If he finished med school in 2003, then started this tour after internship in the summer of 2004 , he stills owes the Navy a few years. This tour in Hawaii will be up in a year. But another tour is to follow. Maybe he'll owes 2 four year stints. Unless NASA snatches him.
    Then he serves the Navy while on loan to them indefinitely?

    PAJAMASAM: do we have any reason to think that Bevin IS angry about anything, or were you speculating?
    No, I said that IF Bevin is angry. Pure speculation. The F2 is often angry. Actually the F 3-4 . Amber was livid. I am hoping that we wont see a repeat of that. In Travis' season Moana was angry at him, but more so at herself. I hope the F2 tonight will react more like Sadie, or Danielle. Of course she'll be sad but I hope she wont lash out at anyone.Partly because it makes me even sadder for the F2 and partly because it makes me happy to think that staying calm just pisses Fleiss off.

    Drew PA
    As a lawyer, I can say that IF there is a contract with the Navy, and IF it uses the word cad, it will be the first contract I've heard about in my 27 years of lawyering that used the term "cad"
    Have you read Trista's contract for which I provided a link at smokinggun.com? What would you do if a client came to you with that? Maybe it's standard reality TV fare, but I find it shocking.

    Archer jinx.

  9. #3819
    FORT Fan
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    202

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Yikes, Archer. That's a long time.

    Now I really wonder how Andy had the nerve to do the show.

    Maybe it's not as big a deal to the Navy as I've been thinking it is.

    I wonder why he said he did not know what he was going to do at the end of this year.

    I'd hate to think that Andy had been speaking of something perfectly innocuous and the editors spliced it into a talk about his career, making it seem . . . Oh, you know. I can't wait for this show to air.

    fp

  10. #3820
    FORT Fan
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    202

    Re: Editing: Is Fleiss messing with us regarding the editing? **SPOILERS**

    Oh, okay, Pajamasam. I get it now, about how Andy's tour is up in a year but not his commitment to the Navy. Thank you.

    (Had my dunce cap on)

    fp

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.