the wobbly runway (what was the point of it being over water and being wobbly you couldn't really tell by the photo anyway)
the freakshow one
the romance novel
and of course the skydiving one
(cycle seven is just full of ridiculous photoshoots)
Team Renee//Team Sarah//
Yeah, cycle seven photo shoots have really blown so far. The only shoot I've been really excited abou was actually the Hair Wars photo.
I think that is good. It's not ridiculous and themed like they've been. It's more relevant to modeling. Cover girl is not mentioned--another good. I definitely think Paris or Milan would be good. Maybe the fashion show could be in New York Fashion Week or even in the fashion weeks at paris or Milan--maybe get in one of the shows for spring collections or something. Just a REAL fashion show for a relevant name. I mean, Heidi Klum can get Michael Kors involved in Project Runway--doesn't Tyra have any contacts that could put them into their shows? Though I wonder with how the show has fallen, they don't want to touch it with a ten foot pole.
Originally Posted by top_gj;2135489;
Goddess of Looks & Books
I liked the Romance Novel covershoot. Of course I'm a romance novel author, so there ya go.
I did not like the skyidiving shoot at all.
To answer someones question. They don't care about showing the new hair. That's not the reason they do the makeovers. Crying model hopefuls, stressing about the loss of their locks, makes for good television. I bet there's a question somewhere that asks how they would react if all their hair was cut off. I suspect the ones that freak out the most at it get their locks shorn.
I'm such a cynic.
Lost in ANTM
No photoshoot can surpass the level of ridiculousness of the Skydiving shoot! Everything about it sucks, we cannot see the girls' faces, the costume is fug and the setting is cartoonish. Seriously, who would wanna buy Covergirl if they see these ads ??? I'm frustrated they didn't photograph the girls like Tyra who looks STUNNING!
NATA NATA NATA
Tyra Tyra Tyra, you are loosing yourself!
You need to have some new photoshoots. The new covergirl shoot, omfg, it sucked.
Why not use some of the old ideas over again, like once a cycle. C1,C2 and C3 had SO many good photoshoots. They were more fashion, realistic. And they actually were photoshoots for real shops and brands.
Skydiving whatever, CRISIS!
The worst to me was:
Cycle 4 Lubederm ad were they painted them to look like animals. The Zodiac shot and the Gas Station photos. Yuck!
Cycle 5 The Fashion Police Chase
Cycle 7 Skydiving, Circus Freaks, Hair Show.
I thought the Zodiac shot was one of the best ever.
Originally Posted by princess07;2150476;
But for me Cycle 1 and 2 were great no pointless shoots there.
Cycle 3- The Jean add
Cycle 4- Gas station
Cycle 5- Ms.J the witch (or whataver its called), Wildboyz (actually wasnt bad just the wildboyz annoy me, and it was a dumb concept)
Cycle 6- the one where they were on Elephants Im an animal activist and was against that.
Cycle 7- Wind Tunnel
What about the snakes in cycle 1? the never-to-be sharks in cycle 2? tarantulas in cycle 3? alligator from cycle 4? the bull that will be on cycle 7? There were animals used in almost every cycle (only 5 did not, but the wildboys were crazy enough lol), the only reason they pulled the sharks from cycle 2 was because some of the girls had their periods and blood + water + shark = hungry shark on the prowl.
Originally Posted by So.Cynical;2150496;
Cycle 1 - I didnt really like the Stuff Magazine shots. I only liked Kesse's shot imo.
Cycle 2 - None. Everything was perfection.
Cycle 3 - The airplane, jumping on the trampoline(sp?)
Cycle 4 - The wonderbra, only Britney had a good picture imo.
Cycle 5 - The Fashion Witch.
Cycle 6 - The Mermaids, I liked the concept/idea, but it turned out horribly.
Cycle 7 - So far, I have to say the "sky-diving" one.
None of the animals were harmed in those ones, Elephants arent meant to treck through the jungle with 3 humans and a hard wooden seat on their backs, thats the only reason I didnt like it.
Originally Posted by KinmokuPrincess;2150527;
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.