Thread: Cycle 5: Nicole

  1. #3651
    Nicole Linkletter - Renee england88533's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,342

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    doesn't mean shes failing....she could have switched agencies again...

    and she was over in Asia earlier this year so that could be why we haven't seen much of her but I hope we see some new shots soon.

  2. #3652
    The Tyrant~ Kahlen_rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,099

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Haha im so glad she is failing
    Even if I don't like a girl,I still wish them to do well,and there simply isn't a reason to feel glad wheter she's doing bad or good.Never expected to read such a comment from you.
    Shooting with the elephant, it reminds me of an ancient
    dinosaur, because they are in the dinosaurs family ,


    === Jade, Cycle 6===

  3. #3653
    FORT Fogey
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,746

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    I feel kinda bad now, Kahlen rocks you are making me feel bad for what i wrote, let me re phrase it a different way...

    Im glad that she is off Elite becuase she Nik would have been better? lool I dont know Nicole was never my favorite china piece in the cupboard

  4. #3654
    What? taffina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Again, if Nik was so much better Elite still would have signed her.

  5. #3655
    Thinking femme fatale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In a world of my own
    Age
    31
    Posts
    2,631

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Quote Originally Posted by taffina;2366831;
    Again, if Nik was so much better Elite still would have signed her.
    Elite wasn't even the price for Nicole's cycle so Elite signed her because they wanted her. It just shows that she does in deed have some potential.

    If they liked Nik as much they would have signed her as well, but they didn't...

  6. #3656
    What? taffina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    ^Well okay, Ford then.
    Some big agency would have signed Nik if she was the superior girl, or even a good model.
    Nicole winning ANTM does not stop the other girlss on the show from getting work with an agency.
    That's all I'm trying to say.

  7. #3657
    Boredom's Victim theart83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,689

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Oh goodness, it doesn't matter if they won or not as long as agencies want to sign them, do you really think they care at all if the person won or not they want someone to be in the agency? So Nik isn't signed by a big agency, what agency cares? If they wanted her, they would've signed her. Nicole has no weight in Nik's future.
    True love comes in quietly, without banners or flashing lights. She is your sanity in a world full of madness. True love is not how grand you are or how simple you are, but's who you are with her and she loves you not in spite of it, but because of it. She is the one that stands with you, when the rest of the world falls down.

  8. #3658
    ascension Celsiso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    24
    Posts
    932

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Eh, I still think that Nicole's look goes a much farther way than Nik's.

  9. #3659
    ~*TEAM JENAH*~ jaylaaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    977

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    Oh my god you guys are still comparing with Nicole and Nik? Whatever, any new photos? I miss Nicole aka the best winner! (If Natasha won't win.)

  10. #3660
    Nicole, Melrose, & Claire Erin_go_bragh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,988

    Re: Cycle 5: Nicole

    I miss Nicole, too! :*

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.