Doesn't seem like too many care, but for those interested, I found a story on this (from: http://www.accessatlanta.com/search/...wednesday.html):
In Los Angeles at the Rose Bowl this past Sunday, the talent show was able to vet 3,000 people in one day, with tents set up on the floor. Fox winnowed far more auditioners in a shorter amount of time than last year because it provided more producers to judge the early rounds.
Only a small percentage of "Idol" wannabes -- presumably the best and the worst -- will have a chance to sing before Simon Cowell, Randy Jackson and Paula Abdul in early September.
The show itself will run in early 2004; auditions are being held earlier than last year to accommodate Cowell, who is judging the U.K. "Pop Idol" show this fall (more details on www.idolonfox.com).
-----------------------------------
My take on this: It is certainly more efficient to have the preliminary auditions only in front of the producers, especially if it means that they can screen more potential contestants. The only thing I don't like about this process is that they are going to drag this out another month with the people considered the "worst." They are leading on the "worst" to believe that they are worthy of another audition, only for them to get shot down by Simon and humiliated on national TV. It's one thing for these people to show up to auditions, spend a day there, and get instantly turned away. It's another thing for these people to show up to auditions, be asked to come back again, think that they could become stars for a month, then get instantly turned away after they get their hopes up.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
